15 Heller, 554 U.S. at 59496. Although the Second Amendment is the only Constitutional amendment with a prefatory clause, such linguistic constructions were widely used elsewhere in the late eighteenth century. 2 Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252, 265 (1886). Pp. denied, 522 U.S. 1007 (1997) (member of Georgia unorganized militia unable to establish that his possession of machine guns and pipe bombs bore any connection to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia). Print 1982); Don B. Kates, Handgun Prohibition And The Original Meaning Of The Second Amendment (1984); Gun Control And The Constitution: Sources And Explorations On The Second Amendment (Robert J. Cottrol ed., 1993); Stephen P. Halbrook, That Every Man Bearmed: The Evolution Of A Constitutional Right (1984); Symposium, Gun Control, 49 Law & Contemp. The prefatory nominative PHRASE (it's only a "clause" to lawyers -- grammarians would rap their knuckles over that) can perfectly well be separated from the independent CLAUSE by a comma. A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of these people people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Probs. If the amendment protects those who constitute the militia, it presumably protects them in a similar way to how they would have been protected around the time of the Founding, when their right to keep and bear arms was contingent on actually serving in the militia and being trained by older adults and was entirely subject to parental whims. denied, 464 U.S. 863 (1983). The Second Amendment reads: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Dennis Baron, Guns and Grammar, 5 Syntax of the Second Amendment Reading the Second Amendment as a statement in which every word counts follows from the opinion articulated by Chief Justice John Marshall: "It cannot be presumed that any clause in the constitution is intended to be without effect" (Marbury v.Madison, 1803). A non sequiturs does not make a sentence ungrammatical. "Independent clauses" doesn't mean "unrelated clauses". Agreed. It must be interpreted with that end in view.5 The significance of the militia, the Court continued, was that it was composed of civilians primarily, soldiers on occasion. It was upon this force that the states could rely for defense and securing of the laws, on a force that comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense, who, when called for service . The non-application of the Second Amendment to the states was reaffirmed in Quilici v. Village of Morton Grove, 695 F.2d 261 (7th Cir. 081521, slip op. As for the "comma splice" issue, the OP cites only contemporary sources, and thus it is appropriate to refute the argument based on contemporary usage, especially since the argument would be nonsensical if based on usage specific to 200 years ago. The Right to Bear Arms - University of Missouri-Kansas City In Cases v. United States, 131 F.2d 916, 922 (1st Cir. The text and context, however, dont point us to an unlimited individual right to bear any kind and number of weapons by anyone, whether a minor or a felon or domestic abuser. And I'm not sure that even that would shore up that argument. Future society where tipping is mandatory, Denys Fisher, of Spirograph fame, using a computer late 1976, early 1977. Right to Bear Arms Second Amendment Right to Bear Arms Overview of Second Amendment, Right to Bear Arms Historical Background on Second Amendment Early Second Amendment Jurisprudence Heller and Individual Right to Firearms Post-Heller Issues and Application of Second Amendment to States However, that doesn't change the fact that the constitution when passed meant it in exactly this way. Antonin Scalia, A Matter Of Interpretation, Federal Courts And The Law. August 26, 2018 55 courtesy gunculture2point0.wordpress.com Next Post has shown, the Second Amendment like the First Amendment was never written to apply to the states themselves, but to Congress. . It is a phrase. There is no remotely sane case for being allowed to purchase, as [Las Vegas mass murderer] Paddock did, 33 firearms in the space of a year. His father rejects his claim, administers corporal punishment to his child, and orders him to report to muster. So throwing up our hands and proclaiming that we cant move forward without a constitutional fix is a flawed response; so is responding to gun-control proposals with outlandish claims of constitutional protection. If you have clicked on the phrase "independent clauses" in the link you provided, or even just hovered over it, you would have seen "An independent clause (or main clause) is a clause that can stand by itself as a simple sentence." It was not until 2008 that the Supreme Court definitively came down on the side of an individual rights theory. . The individual rights thesis emphasized the operative clause, so that individuals would be protected in the ownership, possession, and transportation of firearms.1 Whatever the Amendment meant, it was seen as a bar only to federal action, not state2 or private3 restraints. Why doesnt UDOT release a count of positive and negative gondola comments? Pointing out that interest in the character of the Second Amendment right has recently burgeoned, Justice Thomas, concurring in the Courts invalidation (on other grounds) of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, questioned whether the Second Amendment bars federal regulation of gun sales, and suggested that the Court might determine at some future date . Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution informs our understanding of well regulated. It means the arming and disciplining [and]training of the militia. In Hirschfield v. ATF, for example, the Fourth Circuit looked to militia laws to strike down federal regulations restricting the sale of handguns to 18-20-year-olds. United States v. Wright, 117 F.3d 1265 (11th Cir. The third meaning, "used to make generalized reference to something rather than identifying a particular instance". As Saul Cornell has explained, the idea that being required to serve in the militia represented an entryway to young adulthood at the time of the Founding is dubious at best, because an 18 to 20-year-old militia member had essentially no independent legal rights: Consider the following hypothetical. For over 200 years, despite extensive debate and much legislative action with respect to regulation of the purchase, possession, and transportation of firearms, as well as proposals to substantially curtail ownership of firearms, there was no definitive resolution by the courts of just what right the Second Amendment protects. @Pasha The caveats you've proposed specifically violate the Constitution, and ignores what militia meant at the time of ratification, with specific reference to Federalist 46 and the 10th amendment. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.7, After that decision, Congress placed greater limitations on the receipt, possession, and transportation of firearms,8 and proposals for national registration or prohibition of firearms altogether have been made.9 Miller, however, shed little light on the validity of such proposals. . 2-53. 1410078, slip op. The young man in question has a religious awakening and decides that he wishes to abandon his family and join one of the pacifist religious sects that flourished in the Founding Era, the Shakers or Sandemanians. The Second Amendment is naturally divided into two parts: its prefatory clause ("A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State") and its operative clause ("the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed"). The diagrammed sentence looks like two separate statements. Anyway, if we rewrote the second amendment with more modern definitions, it might say. It's not clear to me what's being said here. While there are some contexts, such as statistics, in which "unrelated" can be treated as being a synonym for "independent", this isn't statistics, this is linguistics. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. Similarly, the phrase security of a free state was found to refer not to the defense of a particular state, but to the protection of the national polity. Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post. 23 Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 149 (1968). That reading makes sense in a larger contextthat of the constitutional situation at the time of the Philadelphia Convention. Militias are made up of people. What is a prefatory clause? . It should be pointed out that the previous supreme court decisions have affirmed that the constitution does not give the citizens rights. The Amendment could be re-phrased, "Because a well regulated Militia is necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. The second amendment is made up of two clauses, the prefatory clause and the Operative Clause. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens militia would be preserved. Chapter 9: Bill of Rights Flashcards The court observed that [t]hose who were obligated to serve in the militia and bring their own arms fall unambiguously within the original public meaning of the people who had a right to keep and bear Arms.. Your premise is patently untrue, as can be seen in the various Militia Acts, and related court decisions, which make a distinction between those qualified for and registered for potential callup in times of need (all able bodied males) and those actually actively serving in said militia. Why commit a "grammatical felony"? There are legitimate linguistic questions as to whether individual gun rights with few restrictions, as they're culturally perceived now, were even constitutionally intended in the first place. Still a grammatical (or semantical?) Saying that two clauses are independent because they are unrelated is like saying that the sentence "There's absolutely nothing wrong with Alice" is in the present perfect (because "perfect" means "nothing wrong"), or "Bob just sat in a chair, neither saying nor doing anything" is in the passive voice (because "passive" means "not doing anything"). As a statement of what the law is, this is flat wrong: The courts have not, to date, interpreted the Second Amendment beyond the right of (in Stephenss phrase) owning a handgun for self-defense, and, in fact, of owning that handgun in the home. (b) The prefatory clause comports with the Courts interpretation of the operative clause. Take a look at the Second Amendment: . I've amended the wording, and also clarified the description of the restrictions on heavy weapons. .wpfts-result-item .wpfts-smart-excerpt {}.wpfts-result-item .wpfts-not-found {color:#808080;font-size:0.9em;}.wpfts-result-item .wpfts-score {color:#006621;font-size:0.9em;}.wpfts-shift {margin-left:40px;}.wpfts-result-item .wpfts-download-link {color:#006621;font-size:0.9em;}.wpfts-result-item .wpfts-file-size {color:#006621;font-size:0.9em;}. Anything less does little more than treat the symptoms of the disease. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. 1236 (1994); Symposium, Symposium on the Second Amendment: Fresh Looks, 76 CHI.-Kent L. Rev. at 62829. It is not attempting to logically prove that the official language is French, simply explaining the Framers' thinking. Justice Scalia, in extra-judicial writing, has sided with the individual rights interpretation of the Amendment. were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time.6 Therefore, [i]n the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a shotgun having a barrel of less than 18 inches in length at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. 24 Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 721 (1997) (internal quotation marks omitted). I brought this up because the anti-gun-rights crowd likes to say that the prefatory clause in the Second Amendment limits our keeping and bearing of arms to militia duty when in fact all the prefatory clause does is follow up on Article I, Section 8, Clauses 14 and 15. 25 McDonald, 561 U.S. ___, No. To perhaps oversimplify the opposing arguments, the states rights thesis emphasized the importance of the prefatory clause, arguing that the purpose of the clause was to protect the states in their authority to maintain formal, organized militia units. . guns_in_openscad on Twitter: "@NairbOtto @gunpolicy "The Amendment's The patriarchal authority of fathers or other legal guardians would have been absolute in this sphere. Lewis v. United States, 445 U.S. 55 (1980); Barrett v. United States, 423 U.S. 212 (1976); Scarborough v. United States, 431 U.S. 563 (1977); United States v. Bass, 404 U.S. 336 (1971). Second Ruling Against California's 'Assault Weapon' Ban Offers Supreme 3 United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876). Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. The Second Amendment is possibly the most hotly debated single sentence of the United States Constitution. However during the 20th Century this became an increasingly impractical idea. The court stated: "The Amendment's prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or. Under the Articles of Confederation, from 1777 on, states were required to maintain their own well regulated and disciplined militia, sufficiently armed and accoutered with a proper quantity of arms, ammunition and camp equipage. The states would appoint all officers under the rank of colonel. However, if the law stated instead "Since loud noises cause suffering to fish and marine animals, driving near schools at speeds above 25mph is prohibited", then the situation would be quite the opposite: now the judge will be forced to conclude that the law only applies to fish schools, not to children. @PoloHoleSet The question specifically asks about Heller. at 59698. ?" The Operative Clause states, ".the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." . The pro-gun side echoes this claim of textual determinism. Grotesque. sltrib.com 1996-2023 The Salt Lake Tribune. Ok, but what if the law did include some clarifying language. Statutory interpretation is a useful constitutional tool, but constitutions arent statutes, and a one-sentence amendment isnt a statute with a separate preamble. The militia clause is an absolute phrase; in grammatical terms, it modifies the entire sentence to which it is attached. 2228. Imagine the situation of an eighteen-year-old who would have been required by law to serve in the Massachusetts militia. Being the most common word in English, it obviously has multiple meanings, but let's focus on just 2: Having these 2 competitive definitions of "the people", let's replace each of them with its synonym and see which one makes better sense: A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of all citizens of the United States to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Your "source" appears to be a conservative advocate (unless there's more than one Daniel J Schultz). Which field is more rigorous, mathematics or philosophy? They have no excuse for it. See Antonin Scalia, A Matter Of Interpretation, Federal Courts And The Law, 13637 n.13 (A. Gutmann, ed., 1997) (responding to Professor Tribes critique of my interpretation of the Second Amendment as a guarantee that the Federal Government will not interfere with the individuals right to bear arms for self-defense). That would be a right that, if recognized by the courts, has the potential to disrupt our society at a profound level; a right that, as Fallowss correspondent blithely asserts, renders the damage of gun violence utterly irrelevant.. Revisiting the Messy Language of the Second Amendment 637 (1989); Joyce Lee Malcolm, Tokeep And Bear Arms: The Origins Of An Anglo-American Right (1994); Glenn Harlan Reynolds, A Critical Guide to the Second Amendment, 62 Tenn. L. Rev. 921928. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Such language has created considerable debate regarding the Amendment's intended scope.On the one hand, some believe that the Amendment's phrase "the right of the people to keep and bear . 237 (2004); E. Volokh, Necessary to the Security of a Free State, 83 Notre Dame L. Rev. I.e. Stephen L. Black seems a little confused about what the words in the Second Amendment mean (One Militia, well regulated, April 18). Letter: What the words in the Second Amendment mean However, basic rules of grammar as well as the Supreme Court's settled precedent make clear that a prefatory clause cannot compel a result contrary to the meaning of a provision's operative language. It isn't a . I kept your wording for the part after the comma. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Then, drawing on statutory interpretation texts, he announced that the militia language expressed the amendments purpose, but that a prefatory clause does not limit or expand the scope of the operative clause.. The two clauses are not unrelated. LII U.S. Constitution Annotated Amendment II. To much of the revolutionary generation, a standing army was the mortal enemy of freedom and self-government. Why is the 2nd Amendment the only one with a prefatory clause - Quora by Kathleen Mary Tepper June 9, 2022 @ 12:01 am. The Prefatory clause states, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State. This being a contrived example, there is no way of knowing whether such argument has any merit to it -- but let's presume the judge decides that "in the absence of any clarifying language, we must assume that both points of view have the right to exist, and therefore the law prohibits both driving near children educational institutions, and near groups of fish or other sea animals". Where to start with a large crack the lock puzzle like this? This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google. Prefatory Clause. Policy (2008). So it may be that the amendments text supports something like where we are now: Dick Heller, a law-abiding citizen, can own a handgun in his home for self-protection. Are Tucker's Kobolds scarier under 5e rules than in previous editions? For example, the majority of the 19th-century courts to consider the question held that prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the Second Amendment or state analogues. As you can see in a, the court is effectively holding the opposite of your assertion, i.e. As is well known (and as has been discussed previously on Language Log here, here, and here ), the Second Amendment is unusual in that it is divided into two distinct parts, which the Court in Heller called the "prefatory clause" and the "operative clause": Prefatory clause: "A well regulated Militia, being . This Q. would benefit from some other source corroborating the comma splice interpretation, perhaps with a quote and a URL. Grammar is about syntax, not the content. This can be further seen in restrictions of the time on who can have arms, including those by law registered for, and simultaneously barred from, service in the militias (non-citizens, Brits, mentally ill etc), which is consistent with the 2nd applying equally to all persons, citizen or not. 1 (2007); What Did Bear Arms Mean in the Second Amendment?, 6 Georgetown J. L. & Pub. 22 The portion of the opinion finding incorporation was authored by Justice Alito, and joined by Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Scalia and Justice Kennedy. Pp. At the time of the Founding Fathers, firearms, especially as used by militias, were generally housed in community armories. Why did the Supreme Court consider the Obamacare Medicaid expansion coercion? Why The Prefatory Clause In The 2A? | Oklahoma Shooters 27 561 U.S. ___, No. 25 The True Meaning of the Second Amendment - The Atlantic 14 Id. at 2022. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - LII / Legal Information Institute at 62425 (quoting United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174, 179 (1939)) (We therefore read Miller to say only that the Second Amendment does not protect those weapons not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, such as short-barreled shotguns.); see also Caetano v. Massachusetts, 577 U.S. ___, No. For over 200 years, the Supreme Court has analyzed the Second Amendment to determine just how far the right to bear arms can go. 21 561 U.S. ___, No. In order to better explain my incredulity, let me start with a simple legal thought experiment: Suppose there is a law that states "Driving near schools at speeds above 25mph is prohibited." Opinion: The precatory clause in the 2nd Amendment - CT Mirror The other consists of two completely unrelated clauses joined by a comma -- a comma splice -- which is a serious grammatical error (a first-degree felony according to Roger Jones). Website designed by Addicott Web. That process has not been used here because it requires a greater consensus (two thirds of each chamber of Congress and the concurrence of three quarters of the states) than currently exists. The Second Amendment is naturally divided into two parts: its prefatory clause and its operative clause. The states were further protected by remarkable supermajority rules: Unless nine states out of 13 agreed, Congress couldnt declare war, raise an army, or even appoint a commander in chief of the army or navy. Even if the nation was invaded, five states could stop any military response; even if the other eight agreed, they would not even be able to appoint a commanding general, much less march against the enemy. Want to improve this question? Gun Rights Supporters Shouldn't Ignore the Second Amendment's Prefatory Second Amendment | Wex | US Law First, the District assumes that the Second Amendment's prefatory clause can alter its operative meaning. The Second Amendment is naturally divided into two parts: its prefatory clause (A well regulated Militia . denied, 519 U.S. 912 (1996); United States v. Gomez, 92 F.3d 770, 775 n.7 (9th Cir. But how did we get here? Federalist 46 and the Second Amendment - Dorf on Law It took me quite a while to realize what your error was, to wit, that you were considering "independent" and "unrelated" to be interchangeable. Is it the implication that the protections of the Second Amendment only apply to the Militia? Gun Control Myth: The Second Amendment Makes Clear Guns Aren't - Mic He insists on asserting his right of conscience and free exercise. . Maybe there was a subsidiary right to bear arms; but the militia is the main thing the Constitution revamped, and the militia is what the Amendment talks about. An example source discussing these two issues. . It makes them utterly irrelevant. Justice Clarence Thomas, as I recently wrote, makes the same claimthat the text of the amendment and the Supreme Courts case law create a fundamental right that is violated by a ban on assault weapons, a waiting period for gun purchases, or limits on high-capacity magazines. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. See Caetano, slip op. The defendants had been released on the basis of the trial court determination that prosecution would violate the Second Amendment and no briefs or other appearances were filed on their behalf; the Court acted on the basis of the governments representations. To be specific, it is a nominative absolute phrase that contains a participial phrase ("being necessary"). at 58091. They were basically saying that people could not organize themselves for defense properly without weapons. While Heller observed that modern developments have limited the degree of fit between the prefatory clause and the protected right, courts continue to focus on militia service in evaluating Second Amendment challengesespecially those dealing with restrictions on gun possession and public carry of guns by specific age groups. at 627 (2008). Find a new justification for keeping handguns which didn't extend to military weapons. "The Amendment's prefatory clause announced a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The Court reached this conclusion after a textual analysis of the Amendment,13 an examination of the historical use of prefatory phrases in statutes, and a detailed exploration of the 18th century meaning of phrases found in the Amendment. .authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col{display:block;float:left;margin-right:3.42%}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col-1{width:5.198%}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col-2{width:13.81%}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col-3{width:22.43%}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col-4{width:31.05%}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col-5{width:39.67%}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col-6{width:48.29%}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col-7{width:56.9%}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col-8{width:65.52%}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col-9{width:74.14%}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col-10{width:82.76%}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col-11{width:91.38%}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col-12{width:100%}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col-last{margin-right:0}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col-first{clear:both}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal.authors-list-cols-2 .authors-list-col:nth-child(2n){margin-right:0}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal.authors-list-cols-2 .authors-list-col:nth-child(2n+1){clear:both}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal.authors-list-cols-3 .authors-list-col:nth-child(3n){margin-right:0}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal.authors-list-cols-3 .authors-list-col:nth-child(3n+1){clear:both}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal.authors-list-cols-4 .authors-list-col:nth-child(4n){margin-right:0}.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal.authors-list-cols-4 .authors-list-col:nth-child(4n+1){clear:both}.authors-list-cols-dir-vertical{column-gap:3.42%}.authors-list-cols-dir-vertical.authors-list-cols-2{column-count:2}.authors-list-cols-dir-vertical.authors-list-cols-3{column-count:3}.authors-list-cols-dir-vertical.authors-list-cols-3{column-count:3}.authors-list-cols-dir-vertical.authors-list-cols-4{column-count:4}.authors-list-clearfix:after,.authors-list-clearfix:before{content:" ";display:table}.authors-list-clearfix:after{clear:both}.authors-list-item{margin-bottom:30px;position:relative}.authors-list-cols-dir-vertical .authors-list-item{break-inside:avoid-column;page-break-inside:avoid}.authors-list-item-thumbnail{margin-bottom:20px;position:relative}.authors-list-item-thumbnail a,.authors-list-item-thumbnail img{display:block;position:relative;border:0}.authors-list-item-thumbnail img{max-width:100%;height:auto;border-radius:inherit;}.authors-list-item-title{font-size:22px;font-weight:700;margin-bottom:5px}.authors-list-item-title a{color:inherit}.authors-list-item-subtitle{margin-bottom:5px;font-size:80%}.authors-list-item-social{margin-bottom:10px}.authors-list-item-social a{font-size:15px;margin-right:5px;text-decoration:none}.authors-list-item-social svg{width:15px}.authors-list-item-social-facebook{fill:#3b5998}.authors-list-item-social-instagram{fill:#405de6}.authors-list-item-social-linkedin{fill:#0077b5}.authors-list-item-social-pinterest{fill:#bd081c}.authors-list-item-social-tumblr{fill:#35465c}.authors-list-item-social-twitter{fill:#1da1f2}.authors-list-item-social-youtube{fill:red}.authors-list-item-social-tiktok{fill:#1e3050}.authors-list-item-excerpt{margin-bottom:10px}.authors-list-items-s2 .authors-list-item-main{position:absolute;bottom:0;left:0;right:0;padding:30px;color:#fff;background:rgba(0,0,0,.3)}.authors-list-items-s2 .authors-list-item-thumbnail{margin-bottom:0}.authors-list-items-s2 .authors-list-item-title{color:inherit}.authors-list-items-s2 .authors-list-item-link{color:inherit}.authors-list-items-s3 .authors-list-item-thumbnail{margin-bottom:0}.authors-list-items-s3 .authors-list-item-main{position:absolute;bottom:0;left:0;right:0;top:0;padding:30px;opacity:0;transform:scale(0);transition:all .3s;background:#fff;border:2px solid #eee}.authors-list-items-s3 .authors-list-item:hover .authors-list-item-main{opacity:1;transform:scale(1)}.authors-list-items-s4 .authors-list-item-thumbnail{float:left;margin-right:20px;width:25%}.authors-list-item-s4 .authors-list-item-main{overflow:hidden}.author-list-item-after-avatar,.author-list-item-after-bio,.author-list-item-after-count,.author-list-item-after-link,.author-list-item-after-title,.author-list-item-before-avatar,.author-list-item-before-bio,.author-list-item-before-count,.author-list-item-before-link,.author-list-item-before-title{margin-bottom:5px}@media only screen and (max-width:767px){.authors-list-cols-dir-horizontal .authors-list-col{width:100%;margin-right:0!important}.authors-list-cols-dir-vertical{column-count:1!important}}.authors-list-pagination{text-align:center}.authors-list-pagination li{display:inline-block;margin:0 2px}.authors-list-pagination li a,.authors-list-pagination li>span{display:inline-block;border:1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.2);padding:10px;line-height:1}.

Brewer High School Calendar 2023, Walk-in Clinic Roseville, Articles P